Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 8:42 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The qup_spi0_default pin override is exactly the same as one already in
> sdm845.dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. New patch.
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts
> index 02dcf75c0745..56a7afb697ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts
> @@ -1274,11 +1274,3 @@ ov7251_ep: endpoint {
> };
> };
> };
> -
> -/* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sdm845.dtsi */
> -&qup_spi0_default {
> - config {
> - drive-strength = <6>;
> - bias-disable;
> - };
> -};
I guess it's more of a question for what Bjorn thinks, but I view the
fact that the drive-strength / bias are in the dtsi file to begin with
as more as a bug in commit 8f6e20adaaf3 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845:
enable dma for spi"), which is where these properties were introduced
to sdm845.dtsi.
The historical guidance from Bjorn was that things like
"drive-strength" and "bias" didn't belong in the SoC dtsi file. Later
we came to an agreement that it could be OK to put drive-strength in
the SoC dtsi file but that bias was still problematic because it meant
ugly "/delete-property/" stuff in the board dtsi files [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/YnSQvyAN3v69an8k@ripper
