Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:46:58 +0530
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx>, andersson@xxxxxxxxxx, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, johan@xxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20221109164719.d7kowdu7wskyzjsc@bogus>
References: <20221108154037.111794-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20221108154037.111794-4-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20221108155717.srlnabls5ze2resx@bogus> <20221109074908.GC4651@thinkpad> <20221109110831.lngwmwyjqp4qj73r@bogus> <20221109123526.GA29805@thinkpad> <20221109164719.d7kowdu7wskyzjsc@bogus>

On 09-11-22, 16:47, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Is the cpufreq_get() API expected
> to return something close to what was set or is it expected to return the
> real set h/w value if and when possible.

The real frequency the hardware is running at.

-- 
viresh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam

References:
- [PATCH v5 0/3] qcom-cpufreq-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
- [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Sudeep Holla
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Sudeep Holla
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
  - From: Sudeep Holla

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: dmaengine: qcom: gpi: add compatible for SM6375
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Add CPU clock provider support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [Linux for Sparc] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]