On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:19:08PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: [...] > qcom_cpufreq_hw_get() returns the frequency that got programmed by the cpufreq > core. But that frequency is not necessarily the one that gets delivered to the > CPU cores because the EPSS/OSM hardware block may vary the frequency after the > DCVS operation. > > So this frequency is the final one that gets delivered to the CPU cores. > OK, thanks for the info. Just wondering if there is any issue making qcom_cpufreq_hw_get() return this value instead of all these complexity. I think the DT binding is too confusing as cpufreq-dt uses that to manage DVFS which this one uses it. If possible we should just make cpufreq_get(cpu) return the value you need and use the same where ever you need. Sorry if I am missing something obvious but I am struggling to see that. -- Regards, Sudeep
