On 10/27/2022 8:08 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/10/2022 16:04, Melody Olvera wrote: >> Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of >> device-specific node names. >> >> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml >> index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml >> @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties: >> $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml# >> >> patternProperties: >> - '-regulators$': >> + 'regulators$': > This should be rather fixed like: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220926092104.111449-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/ Got it. Thanks, Melody > > I don't know why there is such a popularity of adding specific model > names as device node names...
