On 26/10/2022 16:04, Melody Olvera wrote: > Update the bindings to allow for generic regulator nodes instead of > device-specific node names. > > Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml > index 4a50f1d27724..0e7e07975f3a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,rpmh-rsc.yaml > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ properties: > $ref: /schemas/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml# > > patternProperties: > - '-regulators$': > + 'regulators$': This should be rather fixed like: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220926092104.111449-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/ I don't know why there is such a popularity of adding specific model names as device node names... Best regards, Krzysztof
