On 24/10/2022 19:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 24/10/2022 12:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 24/10/2022 17:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 09/12/2021 05:35, Vinod Koul wrote:
Add the spmi bus as found in the SM8450 SoC
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index f75de777f6ea..b80e34fd3fe1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -645,6 +645,24 @@ pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
interrupt-controller;
};
+ spmi_bus: spmi@c42d000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
+ reg = <0x0 0x0c400000 0x0 0x00003000>,
+ <0x0 0x0c500000 0x0 0x00400000>,
+ <0x0 0x0c440000 0x0 0x00080000>,
+ <0x0 0x0c4c0000 0x0 0x00010000>,
+ <0x0 0x0c42d000 0x0 0x00010000>;
This is a patch from December 2021. Is there anything blocking it from
being merged?
The same applies to several other patches here.
As far as I know, Stephen still didn't pick up the spmi-pmic-arb support
for the PMIC on the SM8450 platform. Thus we also can not merge the DT
parts.
Why we cannot merge DTS? How is DTS with new nodes depending on any
driver changes?
In this particular case, there was an open question, what should be the
bindings for the PMIC ARB v7.
Just like I replied to Konrad - if that's true, bindings are simply
wrong and should be fixed.
Maybe I missed the reply. Which email are you referring to?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
