On 2022-10-01 21:08:07, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> msm's dsi_host specifies negative BPG offsets which fill the full 8 bits
> of a char thanks to two's complement: this however results in those bits
> bleeding into the next parameter when the field is only expected to
> contain 6-bit wide values.
> As a consequence random slices appear corrupted on-screen (tested on a
> Sony Tama Akatsuki device with sdm845).
>
> Use AND operators to limit all values that constitute the RC Range
> parameter fields to their expected size.
>
> Fixes: b9080324d6ca ("drm/msm/dsi: add support for dsc data")
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c
> index c869c6e51e2b..2e7ef242685d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dsc_helper.c
> @@ -243,11 +243,11 @@ void drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack(struct drm_dsc_picture_parameter_set *pps_payload,
> */
> for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; i++) {
> pps_payload->rc_range_parameters[i] =
> - cpu_to_be16((dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp <<
> + cpu_to_be16(((dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp & 0x1f) <<
> DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MINQP_SHIFT) |
> - (dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp <<
> + ((dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp & 0x1f) <<
> DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MAXQP_SHIFT) |
> - (dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset));
> + (dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset & 0x3f));
Pre-empting the reviews: I was contemplating whether to use FIELD_PREP
here, given that it's not yet used anywhere else in this file. For that
I'd remove the existing _SHIFT definitions and replace them with:
#define DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MINQP_MASK GENMASK(15, 11)
#define DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MAXQP_MASK GENMASK(10, 6)
#define DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
And turn this section of code into:
cpu_to_be16(FIELD_PREP(DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MINQP_MASK,
dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp) |
FIELD_PREP(DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_MAXQP_MASK,
dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp) |
FIELD_PREP(DSC_PPS_RC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSET_MASK,
dsc_cfg->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset));
Is that okay/recommended?
- Marijn
> }
>
> /* PPS 88 */
> --
> 2.37.3
>
