Quoting Lee Jones (2022-09-28 03:20:30) > Wouldn't it make more sense to simply separate the instantiation of > the 2 I2C devices? Similar to what you suggested [0] in v9. That way > they can handle their own resources and we can avoid all of the I2C > dummy / shared Regmap passing faff. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAE-0n53G-atsuwqcgNvi3nvWyiO3P=pSj5zDUMYj0ELVYJE54Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > You can continue reading the thread[1]. My understanding is it's one chip that responds on two i2c addresses, thus we don't describe that as two i2c device nodes in DT. Instead we describe one node and use the dummy API to make the second i2c device. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yk3NkNK3e+fgj4eG@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
