On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 23:44, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/09/2022 20:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > > > > > On 9/12/22 1:08 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 21:42, Bhupesh Sharma > >> <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Introduce CONFIG_QCOM_THERMAL to allow better control > >>> over selection of various Qualcomm Thermal drivers > >>> available inside qcom/ directory. > >>> > >>> This is a preparatory change to allow new drivers to > >>> be added inside qcom/ directory in a more structured > >>> fashion. > >>> > >>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Amit Kucheria <amitk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/thermal/Makefile | 2 +- > >>> drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++ > >>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile > >>> index def8e1a0399c..a12b647be0d1 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile > >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile > >>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DA9062_THERMAL) += da9062-thermal.o > >>> obj-y += intel/ > >>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SOC_THERMAL) += ti-soc-thermal/ > >>> obj-y += st/ > >>> -obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_TSENS) += qcom/ > >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_THERMAL) += qcom/ > >> > >> Following other platforms around qcom, I think just `obj-y += qcom/` > >> would work well enough. > > > > I have no strong opinion on using `obj-y += qcom/` here, but I would > > still like us to define a CONFIG_QCOM_THERMAL like flag in the > > qcom/Kconfig, similar to the ST platforms which use similar selection > > mechanism via 'CONFIG_ST_THERMAL'. > > `QCOM_THERMAL' is fine for me. Sure, let me send v2 accordingly. Thanks, Bhupesh