On 12/09/2022 20:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
On 9/12/22 1:08 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 21:42, Bhupesh Sharma
<bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Introduce CONFIG_QCOM_THERMAL to allow better control
over selection of various Qualcomm Thermal drivers
available inside qcom/ directory.
This is a preparatory change to allow new drivers to
be added inside qcom/ directory in a more structured
fashion.
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Amit Kucheria <amitk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
index def8e1a0399c..a12b647be0d1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DA9062_THERMAL) += da9062-thermal.o
obj-y += intel/
obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SOC_THERMAL) += ti-soc-thermal/
obj-y += st/
-obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_TSENS) += qcom/
+obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_THERMAL) += qcom/
Following other platforms around qcom, I think just `obj-y += qcom/`
would work well enough.
I have no strong opinion on using `obj-y += qcom/` here, but I would
still like us to define a CONFIG_QCOM_THERMAL like flag in the
qcom/Kconfig, similar to the ST platforms which use similar selection
mechanism via 'CONFIG_ST_THERMAL'.
`QCOM_THERMAL' is fine for me.
Thanks.
obj-y += tegra/
obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_THERMAL) += hisi_thermal.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_THERMAL) += mtk_thermal.o
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
