On Sun, 11 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> > >> However I think there is no such problem, as Dmitry said, that ref > >> changes anything. There will be always failure - either from parent > >> schema (using $ref) or from device child schema (the one which actually > >> misses the property). > > > > Initially I stumbled upon this issue with the dsi and dsi_phy nodes > > for msm8996 devices. If I have $ref here, dsi1/dsi1_phy nodes will > > emit warnings regarding the missing -supply properties despite nodes > > being disabled. If I use `compatible' here, the schema checks pass. > > Thus I'd prefer to leave `compatible' here. Not to mention that it > > also allows specifying a tighter binding than just using the $ref. > > I don't think we understood each other. I claim that error will be there > anyway, just from different schema. So your change fixes nothing in > total schema check... If the node is disabled, there will be no different schema check. -- With best wishes Dmitry
