On 10/09/2022 14:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> >> However I think there is no such problem, as Dmitry said, that ref >> changes anything. There will be always failure - either from parent >> schema (using $ref) or from device child schema (the one which actually >> misses the property). > > Initially I stumbled upon this issue with the dsi and dsi_phy nodes > for msm8996 devices. If I have $ref here, dsi1/dsi1_phy nodes will > emit warnings regarding the missing -supply properties despite nodes > being disabled. If I use `compatible' here, the schema checks pass. > Thus I'd prefer to leave `compatible' here. Not to mention that it > also allows specifying a tighter binding than just using the $ref. I don't think we understood each other. I claim that error will be there anyway, just from different schema. So your change fixes nothing in total schema check... Best regards, Krzysztof
