On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:14:25PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > So if we need this beyond PSCI FID range, better you have it as generic > > SMCCC debug FS. Thoughts ? > > That thought did cross my mind when reviewing Dmitry's patch but given > that as far as I'm aware SMCCC isn't particularly enumerable it seemed > like it might be more of a small library of helpers than something you > could write a general structure for. I might be missing something > though. Agreed. I don't know how feasible in that yet, but would like to know Florian's thoughts/requirements to give it a thought. I don't think you are missing anything. One thing I thought is to add SMCCC version as well if we are adding PSCI version as lots of new additions have happened and it is good to have info IMO. SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES query APIs might be useful. This is just initial thoughts. -- Regards, Sudeep