On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 11:45:10AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > Yes I would agree with both of those points, in fact, I would go one step > further and add the ability to probe an arbitrary PSCI function ID, since > deployed firmware typically go beyond the standard PSCI scope and implement > a variety of custom extensions (at least we do). > Technically they must not be PSCI right ? Also I hope they are not using Arm Architecture/CPU service range of FID and they use SiP/OEM service range. From what I understand, you need a generic debug FS for all SMCCC instead of just PSCI in your case. The latter must cover PSCI as well while the reverse must not happen. So if we need this beyond PSCI FID range, better you have it as generic SMCCC debug FS. Thoughts ? -- Regards, Sudeep
