Hi, On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:52 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:39 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > You could add a way to specify constant base loads in DT on either a per > > > regulator or per consumer basis. > > > > Yes, this please! ...on a per consumer basis. :-) It's been on my > > wishlist for a while and would eliminate a massive amount of code / > > tables in the drivers. > > > > We could debate syntax, but I guess you'd either do it w/ two cells > > > > vdda-phy-supply = <&vdda_mipi_dsi0_1p2 21800>; > > > > ...or with matching properties: > > > > vdda-phy-supply = <&vdda_mipi_dsi0_1p2>; > > vdda-phy-supply-base-load = <21800>; > > Ah, sorry to respond to my own thread so quickly, but I just thought > of a reason for the "matching properties" solution instead of the two > cells. It would allow the SoC "dtsi" file to specify a base load while > the board "dts" file can then specify the supply. That feels like it > could be a nice solution. This seemed easy, so I whipped up a quick prototype. Forewarned that I did very little detailed testing. I didn't CC everyone on this thread, but hopefully folks can find it if they are interested... https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721182622.RFC.1.I8a64b707169cfd73d9309c5eaf5d43b8bc4db988@changeid -Doug
