On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 07:52:01AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:39 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > vdda-phy-supply = <&vdda_mipi_dsi0_1p2>; > > vdda-phy-supply-base-load = <21800>; > Ah, sorry to respond to my own thread so quickly, but I just thought > of a reason for the "matching properties" solution instead of the two > cells. It would allow the SoC "dtsi" file to specify a base load while > the board "dts" file can then specify the supply. That feels like it > could be a nice solution. For a per device thing it probably shouldn't be called a "base load", it's just the load. I would question how useful this would be, aside from the concerns vendors will likely have with disclosing actual power consumptions if the number never changes then it is immaterial which device contributes which milliamp of load, you just want to configure a fixed mode on the regulator and have done with it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
