On 20/07/2022 17:13, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:10 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/07/2022 04:51, Yunlong Jia wrote:
>>> SKU6 is LTE(w/o eSIM)+WIFI+Parade
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts
>>> index 764c451c1a857..4649eaec6318d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>>>
>>> / {
>>> model = "Google Pazquel (Parade,LTE)";
>>> - compatible = "google,pazquel-sku4", "qcom,sc7180";
>>> + compatible = "google,pazquel-sku4", "google,pazquel-sku6", "qcom,sc7180";
>>
>> You miss binding change and sku6 should be rather added before sku4 as
>> it is more specific, isn't it?
>
> Just to close the loop: the order doesn't matter at all. Neither sku4
> nor sku6 is "more specific". One has the eSIM stuffed and one doesn't.
Thanks Doug. Then the commit description could be improved, so reviewer
does not have to ask such questions. Otherwise it is confusing to see a
board which says it is for LTE version but it is actually not for LTE
version (or whatever combination you have).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
