Hi,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:10 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 20/07/2022 04:51, Yunlong Jia wrote:
> > SKU6 is LTE(w/o eSIM)+WIFI+Parade
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts
> > index 764c451c1a857..4649eaec6318d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-pazquel-lte-parade.dts
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> >
> > / {
> > model = "Google Pazquel (Parade,LTE)";
> > - compatible = "google,pazquel-sku4", "qcom,sc7180";
> > + compatible = "google,pazquel-sku4", "google,pazquel-sku6", "qcom,sc7180";
>
> You miss binding change and sku6 should be rather added before sku4 as
> it is more specific, isn't it?
Just to close the loop: the order doesn't matter at all. Neither sku4
nor sku6 is "more specific". One has the eSIM stuffed and one doesn't.
I don't personally care about what order these are listed in, though,
so if Krzysztof is happier with "sku6" being first then I'm OK w/ it
as long as it matches the bindings.
-Doug
