On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:48:42PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2014, at 1:28 AM, Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +linux-arm-msm > > On Tuesday 23 September 2014 11:38 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > >> This change replaces use of arm_pm_restart with recently introduced > >> reset mechanism in Linux kernel called restart_notifier. > > Can you update the commit message to include details about the priority level we are setting it to. > > Probably something like Josh had: > > Choose priority 128, as according to documentation, this mechanism "is > sufficient to restart the entire system?. > > Hmm, what happens if we have ps_hold restart and msm-poweroff enabled. > Which one should have priority? I would hope we would avoid a situation where both this driver is probed, and the pinctrl-msm driver has registered a restart handler? That is, we wouldn't ever mix the pinctrl-msm ps_hold mechanism (for MSM8660/MSM8960/APQ8064, etc) and msm-poweroff (APQ8074 and later). Is this a case you're worried about? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
