On Thu 02 Jun 00:08 PDT 2022, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> -static const struct of_device_id qcom_qmp_phy_of_match_table[] = {
[..]
> - }, {
> - .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-phy",
We have a few examples of these, where we have a compatible for the
USB-half of the combo PHY. For backwards compatibility I think we would
want to retain these, but if we move them to the UNI phy driver wouldn't
we end up with duplicate USB configuration tables between the two files?
Should we keep the combo instances here as well?
Regards,
Bjorn
> - .data = &qmp_v3_usb3phy_cfg,
> - }, {
