On 19/05/2022 12:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/05/2022 12:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 19/05/2022 11:57, Yassine Oudjana wrote: >>>> >>>> There is no such property documented. Either add bindings, or drop. >>>> >>>>> + qcom,board-id = <47 0>; >>>> >>>> >>>> The same. >>> >>> These properties are already used in many device trees; they are >>> needed to let the bootloader pick a DTB, but yes they aren't >>> documented currently. devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml would >>> probably be a good place to put them. >> >> Which means each person is using them and not caring about >> documenting... they need to be documented. I am not even sure if they >> should be accepted. >> >> The DTS describes hardware, not bootloader specific details. The >> hardware - board - is defined by compatible and bootloader should use >> it. Adding new properties because someone decided "I don't like >> compatibles" is not appropriate. > > There is prior art: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/26/651 > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqJAOEvs08Jydn9wWtM7-Oxd=MmmDER48VRF7z3Gkzt0CQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I found the discussions and I see it stalled. No objection from my side on this one here. We should solve it on other level., Best regards, Krzysztof
