On 10 September 2014 17:38, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > Here is the v2 of the platform_data based proposal to make cpufreq-dt > understand when it has a shared clock by all CPUs vs. independent > clock for each CPU. > > Changes since v1: > > - Use a 'void *driver_data' in cpufreq_driver instead of extending > the existing flags field. Suggested by Viresh. > > - Keep the regulator related warning in cpufreq-dt, but reword it, > and move it to the dev_dbg() level instead of dev_warn(). > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > Thomas Petazzoni (4): > cpufreq: allow driver-specific data > cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: extend with platform_data > ARM: mvebu: use the cpufreq-dt platform_data for independent clocks > cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: adjust message related to regulators After Arnd's reply: Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
