On 18/04/2022 21:20, Kuldeep Singh wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:57:55AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> Please see <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220211214941.f55q5yksittut3ep@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m6700c2695ee78e79060ac338d208ffd08ac39592>, >> I already have an effort ongoing for converting qcom bam DMA bindings >> to YAML format. > > Ohh ok, I wasn't aware you had similar series. > I just noticed your latest v5 version was rolled out ~5 months back, > usually this is a very long time considering the duration. Wondering > reason behind this.. > > My updated series(v3 version[1]) is kind of complete and mostly reviewed > by Krzysztof and takes care of armv7/8 based platforms. My review was only about patch correctness, not overall patch preference. > With no offence, > I believe we should go with the current one as your series includes > changes more than BAM and will take long time to merge. Anyway, I'll be > fine with choice of the maintainers. I appreciate your work Kuldeep, it is important and valuable contribution. It is sad to see duplicated effort, I don't like it for my own patches either. In general, I believe the FIFO approach should be applied, so in this case Bhupesh patches. Before starting the conversion the best is to look for prior work on lore: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=dfn%3Aqcom_bam_dma.txt This way you could easily avoid doing the same. Bhupesh, Please check what was stopping your work, you might need to rebase it and resend it. Best regards, Krzysztof
