On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Md,
>
> quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:50:48 +0530:
>
> > > Hi Md,
> > >
> > > quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:09:33 +0530:
> > >
> > >> This patch fixes a memory corruption that occurred in the
> > >> nand_scan() path for Hynix nand device.
> > >>
> > >> On boot, for Hynix nand device will panic at a weird place:
> > >> | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
> > >> address 00000070
> > >> | [00000070] *pgd=00000000
> > >> | Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM Modules linked in:
> > >> | CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.0-01473-g13ae1769cfb0
> > >> #38
> > >> | Hardware name: Generic DT based system PC is at
> > >> | nandc_set_reg+0x8/0x1c LR is at qcom_nandc_command+0x20c/0x5d0
> > >> | pc : [<c088b74c>] lr : [<c088d9c8>] psr: 00000113
> > >> | sp : c14adc50 ip : c14ee208 fp : c0cc970c
> > >> | r10: 000000a3 r9 : 00000000 r8 : 00000040
> > >> | r7 : c16f6a00 r6 : 00000090 r5 : 00000004 r4 :c14ee040
> > >> | r3 : 00000000 r2 : 0000000b r1 : 00000000 r0 :c14ee040
> > >> | Flags: nzcv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none
> > >> | Control: 10c5387d Table: 8020406a DAC: 00000051 Register r0
> > >> | information: slab kmalloc-2k start c14ee000 pointer offset
> > >> 64 size 2048
> > >> | Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, stack limit = 0x(ptrval)) nandc_set_reg
> > >> | from qcom_nandc_command+0x20c/0x5d0 qcom_nandc_command from
> > >> | nand_readid_op+0x198/0x1e8 nand_readid_op from
> > >> | hynix_nand_has_valid_jedecid+0x30/0x78
> > >> | hynix_nand_has_valid_jedecid from hynix_nand_init+0xb8/0x454
> > >> | hynix_nand_init from nand_scan_with_ids+0xa30/0x14a8
> > >> | nand_scan_with_ids from qcom_nandc_probe+0x648/0x7b0
> > >> | qcom_nandc_probe from platform_probe+0x58/0xac
> > >>
> > >> The problem is that the nand_scan()'s qcom_nand_attach_chip callback
> > >> is updating the nandc->max_cwperpage from 1 to 4.This causes the
> > >> sg_init_table of clear_bam_transaction() in the driver's
> > >> qcom_nandc_command() to memset much more than what was initially
> > >> allocated by alloc_bam_transaction().
> > > Thanks for investigating!
> > >
> > >> This patch will update nandc->max_cwperpage 1 to 4 after nand_scan()
> > >> returns, and remove updating nandc->max_cwperpage from
> > >> qcom_nand_attach_chip call back.
> > > The fix does not look right, as far as I understand, this should be properly handled during the attach phase. That is where we have all information about the chip and do the configuration for this chip.
> > >
> > > If you update max_cwperpage there you should probably update other internal variables that depend on it as well.
> >
> > Currently we are updating max_cwperpage in qcom_nand_attach_chip(), but we are seeing issue for Hynix nand device since nand_scan_tail() is getting called after nand_attach() and in nand_attach() we are updating max_cwperpage to 4 or 8 based on page size.
> >
> > From nand_scan_tail() there is a call for nand_manufacturer_init() , specific to Hynix nand read_id is getting called that's why we are seeing this issue only for Hynix nand device. Read id sequence as below
> >
> > hynix_nand_has_valid_jedecid()
> >
> > |
> >
> > nand_readid_op()
> >
> > |
> >
> > qcom_nandc_command()
> >
> > |
> >
> > pre_command()
> >
> > |
> >
> > clear_bam_transaction() --> In this call we are doing sg_init_table() which is calling memset() based on max_cwperpage.Since initially we have allocated bam transaction as per max_cwperpage =1 and , since nand_chip_attach() updated max_cwperpage, now we are doing memset as per max_cwperpage = 4 or 8.
> >
> >
> > So anyway we have to updated max_cwperpage after nand_scan() call only. Since there is no other dependency on max_cwperpage in nand_attach_chip() and we are using this in bam_alloc() and bam_clear().
>
> Why don't you update the sg table after increasing max_cwperpage?
>
Or we could move the bam reallocation inside qcom_nand_attach_chip() as below?
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index 7c6efa3b6255..58c16054630f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2653,9 +2653,23 @@ static int qcom_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &qcom_nand_ooblayout_ops);
+ /* Free the initially allocated BAM transaction for reading the ONFI params */
+ if (nandc->props->is_bam)
+ free_bam_transaction(nandc);
+
nandc->max_cwperpage = max_t(unsigned int, nandc->max_cwperpage,
cwperpage);
+ /* Now allocate the BAM transaction based on updated max_cwperpage */
+ if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
+ nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc);
+ if (!nandc->bam_txn) {
+ dev_err(nandc->dev,
+ "failed to allocate bam transaction\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ }
+
/*
* DATA_UD_BYTES varies based on whether the read/write command protects
* spare data with ECC too. We protect spare data by default, so we set
@@ -2956,17 +2970,6 @@ static int qcom_nand_host_init_and_register(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
- free_bam_transaction(nandc);
- nandc->bam_txn = alloc_bam_transaction(nandc);
- if (!nandc->bam_txn) {
- dev_err(nandc->dev,
- "failed to allocate bam transaction\n");
- nand_cleanup(chip);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- }
-
ret = mtd_device_parse_register(mtd, probes, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (ret)
nand_cleanup(chip);
Thanks,
Mani
