On 2022-04-14 17:59:28, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > As suggested by Bjorn during review of [1], the vdda-pll-supply' & > 'vdda-phy-supply' supplies denote the power for the bus and the > clock of the UFS PHY. > > For pdx215 to have a functional UFS [..] safe to assume [..] By "functional" you are referring to sending a certain UFS command that accidentally wipes the bootloader [1] [2], turning the device into a _very_ expensive (+$1000) paperweight? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211111184630.605035-1-konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]: https://github.com/kholk/kernel/commit/2e7a9ee1c91a016baa0b826a7752ec45663a0561 > In absence of the same 'make dtbs_check' leads to following warnings: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami-pdx215.dt.yaml: > phy-wrapper@88e9000: 'vdda-phy-supply' is a required property > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami-pdx215.dt.yaml: > phy-wrapper@88e9000: 'vdda-pll-supply' is a required property > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220228123019.382037-9-bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami.dtsi | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami.dtsi > index 90b13cbe2fa6..238ac9380ca2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami.dtsi > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > * Copyright (c) 2021, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > */ > > +#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h> > #include "sm8350.dtsi" > #include "pm8350.dtsi" > #include "pm8350b.dtsi" > @@ -75,6 +76,27 @@ ramoops@ffc00000 { > }; > }; > > +&apps_rsc { > + pm8350-rpmh-regulators { > + compatible = "qcom,pm8350-rpmh-regulators"; > + qcom,pmic-id = "b"; > + > + vreg_l1b_0p88: ldo1 { > + regulator-name = "vreg_l1b_0p88"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = <912000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <920000>; > + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; > + }; > + > + vreg_l6b_1p2: ldo6 { > + regulator-name = "vreg_l6b_1p2"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1208000>; > + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > &adsp { > status = "okay"; > firmware-name = "qcom/adsp.mbn"; > @@ -256,4 +278,7 @@ &usb_1_hsphy { > > &usb_1_qmpphy { > status = "okay"; > + > + vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>; > + vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l1b_0p88>; I'm probably understanding your patch wrong, but this is the USB phy, not the UFS phy? The warning from dtbs_check on `phy-wrapper@88e9000` is also the `qmp-usb3-phy`, not the `qmp-ufs-phy` - seems this patch has little to do with UFS after all? > }; > -- > 2.35.1 >
