On 8/18/2014 2:26 PM, joro@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:46PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote: >> On 8/18/2014 11:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > >> No, I do not have other uses right now. But could imagine use cases like >> "force <insert minimum mapping size here> mapping" flag etc. > > I think it is worth discussing to add a flush() function to the > IOMMU-API. I sent a patch-set myself a few years ago introducing an > iommu_commit() function with the same semantics, but this is > out-of-scope for this patch-set. > > Also adding a flag parameter to iommu_map_sg would introduce an > asymentrie in the API to the iommu_map() function. So please leave it > out for this patch-set, when we really need a flag parameter someday we > can introduce it for iommu_map() and iommu_map_sg() together. > Sure, I can remove it. I was trying to make iommu_map_sg/iommu_unmap_sg symmetric :-) Anything else before I push v6? Thanks, Olav -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
