On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:56:11AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote: > On 8/12/2014 3:48 AM, Rob Clark wrote: > > iirc, one plan for 'flags' was some sort of DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag for > > drivers which wanted to map/unmap N buffers with a single flush at the > > end. There might have been some other usages envisioned. > > Yes, that was the original intent of the flags for now. I am sure we can > find other uses for this in the future. Do you have anything else in mind already besides the DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag? How is the IOTLB supposed to be flushed when this flag is used? Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
