On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:51:48AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Mark Brown (2022-04-06 08:45:41) > > There's a MFD parent for it, and if it's for an I2C device for a pm8008 > > why would it have a -regulators in the name? > There are two i2c devices. One is pm8008 at i2c address 0x8 and one is > pm8008-regulators at i2c address 0x9. Earlier revisions of this patch > series were making it very confusing by redoing the pm8008 binding and > adding the pm8008-regulator i2c address device to the same binding and > driver. > My guess is that this is one IC that responds to multiple i2c addresses. > The "main" qcom,pm8008 address is 0x8 and that supports things like > interrupts. Then there's an address for regulators at 0x9 which controls > the handful of LDOs on the PMIC. So it's like the TI TWL4030 and Palmas - in which case it should probably be handled similarly? Note that the original sumbission was *also* a MFD subfunction, but using a DT compatible to match the platform device - this is the first I've heard of this being a separate I2C function.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
