Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-03-25 05:17:36) > The msm_mdss serves several roles at this moment. It provides IRQ domain > used by MDP5 and DPU drivers but it also serves as a component master > for both those usecases. MDP4 (which does not have separate MDSS device) > is the component master on it's own. > Remove this assymmetry and make both MDP5 and DPU component masters too. > This removes a need to care about drm/components from msm_mdss driver, > removes an mdss pointer from struct msm_drm_private and simplifies the > interface between mdp5/dpu and msm_drv. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>