RE: [PATCH v5 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Enable backlight for eDP panel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 2:58 AM
> To: Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) <quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: robdclark@xxxxxxxxx; seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx; quic_kalyant
> <quic_kalyant@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)
> <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>; dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Kuogee Hsieh
> (QUIC) <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>; agross@xxxxxxxxxx;
> bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> sean@xxxxxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx;
> thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx; sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx; quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Enable backlight for
> eDP panel
> 
> Quoting Sankeerth Billakanti (2022-03-16 10:35:48)
> > Enable backlight support for eDP panel on CRD platform for sc7280.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> >   - Separate out backlight nodes
> >
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> > index 2df654e..16d1a5b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> > @@ -37,6 +37,15 @@
> >                 pinctrl-0 = <&edp_panel_power>;
> >         };
> >
> > +       edp_backlight: edp-backlight {
> 
> Does this also move to qcard.dtsi? Why can't this be combined with the
> previous patch?
> 
The nodes related to pwm are dependent on
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=620127&state=*

We moved them to different patch so that the other patch can be merged without depending on above series. I will rearrange to get backlight definitions also here.

> > +               compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> > +
> > +               power-supply = <&vreg_edp_bp>;
> > +               pwms = <&pm8350c_pwm 3 65535>;
> > +
> > +               enable-gpios = <&pm8350c_gpios 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > +       };
> > +
> >         vreg_edp_bp: vreg-edp-bp-regulator {
> >                 compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >                 regulator-name = "vreg_edp_bp"; @@ -123,7 +132,9 @@
> > ap_ts_pen_1v8: &i2c13 {
> >                 edp_panel: edp-panel {
> >                         compatible = "edp-panel";
> >
> > +                       backlight = <&edp_backlight>;
> >                         power-supply = <&edp_3v3_regulator>;
> > +
> 
> Nitpick: Remove this newline from this hunk and put it in when power-supply
> is introduced.
> 

Okay, will make that change.

> >                         ports {
> >                                 #address-cells = <1>;
> >                                 #size-cells = <0>; @@ -172,6 +183,13
> > @@ ap_ts_pen_1v8: &i2c13 {
> >         };
> >  };
> >
> > +&pm8350c_pwm {
> > +       status = "okay";
> > +
> > +       pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +       pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_pwm>;
> 
> I see the pinctrl is used now but it would be easier to review this patch if the
> pinctrl was in this patch.

Okay. I will rearrange the hunks from this and the previous patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux