On 8/4/2014 2:41 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Olav, > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 01:47:43AM +0100, Olav Haugan wrote: >> Stage-1 context bank does not have SMMU_CBn_TCR[SL0] field. SL0 field >> is only applicable to stage-2 context banks. > > Ha, I actually noticed this last week but didn't get around to writing a > a fix. Thanks for taking a look! > >> Signed-off-by: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 5 +++-- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c >> index ff6633d..a83ca6a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c >> @@ -833,6 +833,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_init_context_bank(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain) >> reg |= (TTBCR2_ADDR_48 << TTBCR_PASIZE_SHIFT); >> break; >> } >> + reg |= (TTBCR_SL0_LVL_1 << TTBCR_SL0_SHIFT); >> + > > I think this block is all predicated on smmu->version > 1, so we need > something for stage2 CBs on SMMUv1 too. Oh, I see. I will fix that. Olav -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html