Re: [PATCH v1 09/11] mmc: mmci: Add clock support for Qualcomm.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM,  <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> MCICLK going to card bus is directly driven by the clock controller, so the
> driver has to set the required rates depending on the state of the card. This
> bit of support is very much similar to bypass mode but there is no such thing
> called bypass mode in MCICLK register of Qcom SD card controller. By default
> the clock is directly driven by the clk controller.
>
> This patch adds clock support for Qualcomm SDCC in the driver. This bit of
> code is conditioned on hw designer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
(...)
> +               if (host->hw_designer == AMBA_VENDOR_QCOM) {
> +                       host->cclk = host->mclk;
> +               } else if (desired >= host->mclk) {

Again refrain from hard-checking the vendor everywhere.

struct variant_data {
        bool            qcom_cclk_is_mclk;
(...)

As per example from st_clkdiv...

Then

if (host->vendor->qcom_cclk_is_mclk) {
  (...)
}

> +       if (ios->clock != host->mclk &&
> +               host->hw_designer == AMBA_VENDOR_QCOM) {
> +               /* Qcom MCLKCLK register does not define bypass bits */
> +               int rc = clk_set_rate(host->clk, ios->clock);
> +               if (rc < 0) {
> +                       dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +                               "Error setting clock rate (%d)\n", rc);
> +               } else {
> +                       host->mclk = clk_get_rate(host->clk);
> +                       host->cclk = host->mclk;
> +               }
> +       }

For this I would define a vendor data like:

struct variant_data {
        bool            explicit_mclk_control;
(...)

Or something. It explains what is actually going on.

>         if (plat->f_max)
> -               mmc->f_max = min(host->mclk, plat->f_max);
> +               mmc->f_max = (host->hw_designer == AMBA_VENDOR_QCOM) ?
> +                               plat->f_max : min(host->mclk, plat->f_max);

So rewrite like that:

if (host->vendor->explicit_mclk_control)
       mmc->f_max = plat->f_max;
else
      mmc->f_max = min(host->mclk, plat->f_max);

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux