On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:54:00AM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
<snip>
> > +
> > +struct gsbi_dev {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + void __iomem *base;
>
> You don't really need these.
Old habits die hard. I'll remove.
<snip>
> > + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,mode", &mode)) {
> > + dev_err(gsbi->dev, "missing mode configuration\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> I'm wondering if you should really be a (very simple) pinctrl driver
> proper.
Perhaps. But how would i reconcile more than one device node that uses the same
GSBI? One could still trounce the other unless I only allow one setting of the
GSBI.
<snip>
> > + clk_prepare_enable(gsbi->hclk);
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed((mode << GSBI_PROTOCOL_SHIFT), gsbi + GSBI_CTRL_REG);
>
> Did you mean: gsbi->base + GSBI_CTRL_REG ?
Ouch, how did this get munged. I'll fix this on resend.
<snip>
> > +
> > +static struct of_device_id gsbi_dt_match[] = {
>
> const
Will fix.
--
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
