On 04/08/14 08:39, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:57:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting hardware is made up a per-CPU >> interrupt for the L1 cache and a SPI interrupt for the L2. >> >> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt >> index b90fcc7c53cf..d7357e777399 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt > Right, that's http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg308540.html > > So whoever picks those patches up, Lorenzo's doc needs to be in his tree > first too. > > How about I review the EDAC part and an arm maintainer picks the whole > series up? Would that be easier, logistically? > That sounds fine if you want to give an ack on the edac changes. I can route it through arm-soc. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
