Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/30/13 14:56, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/13 14:45, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> +l2-cache node containing the following properties:
>>> Is the L1 interrupt not per core L1 cache (even if they are OR together at PIC)?
>> Yes it is per CPU. That is what the 0xf part of the cpus interrupts
>> property is showing.
> Than why not have it in each cpu node?

Because that duplicates things unnecessarily? The cpus node can hold
things that are common to all CPUs to avoid duplication. If it was a
different PPI for each CPU then I would agree that we need to put it in
each cpu node.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux