On Oct 12, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
> which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
> For now, just support a basic machine with device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 3 ++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts | 6 +++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig | 13 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c | 9 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 000cf76..e71a3ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_KIRKWOOD) += kirkwood-cloudbox.dtb \
> kirkwood-openblocks_a6.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MARCO) += marco-evb.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
> - msm8960-cdp.dtb
> + msm8960-cdp.dtb \
> + qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MVEBU) += armada-370-db.dtb \
> armada-370-mirabox.dtb \
> armada-370-netgear-rn102.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..13ac3e2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +#include "qcom-msm8974.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard";
> + compatible = "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard", "qcom,apq8074";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e0fd55a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "skeleton.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Qualcomm MSM8974";
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8974";
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +
> + soc: soc { };
Was there an answer to Olof's question about:
For files that include this it's ok to use the &phandle syntax, but in this
base dtsi, please use proper structure. In other words, move the contents of
the soc node up above instead.
> +};
> +
> +&soc {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> +
> + intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + reg = <0xf9000000 0x1000>,
> + <0xf9002000 0x1000>;
> + };
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> + interrupts = <1 2 0xf08>,
> + <1 3 0xf08>,
> + <1 4 0xf08>,
> + <1 1 0xf08>;
> + clock-frequency = <19200000>;
> + };
> +};
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
