On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As Stephen W has pointed out previously, the dtb filename itself is or >> may be an ABI and the bootloader may be hardcoded to a name. So we >> should avoid future renames. > > We still have the choice of producing the dtb files under > arch/arm/boot/dts even if we move dts/dtsi files one level deeper, as > long as we keep the filenames consistent. So we can do a move, just > not a rename. Looking at arch/arm/boot/dts/ we are all over the place, so what's the naming convention we are going forward with? - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
