Quoting Saravana Kannan (2013-05-15 21:34:03) > On 05/09/2013 11:35 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > With deferred probing, late_initcall() is too soon to declare a clock as > > unused. Wait for deferred probing to finish before declaring a clock as > > unused. Since deferred probing is done in late_initcall(), do the unused > > check to late_initcall_sync. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > > index fe4055f..5ecb64c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > > @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int clk_disable_unused(void) > > > > return 0; > > } > > -late_initcall(clk_disable_unused); > > +late_initcall_sync(clk_disable_unused); > > > > /*** helper functions ***/ > > Mike, > > Thoughts? Picking it up? Removing the existing auto-disable code (I > think they are still useful)? > Hi Saravana, I've taken this into clk-next for testing. Regards, Mike > -Saravana > > > -- > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
