On 05/16/2013 05:55 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 16 May 2013 06:34, Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/09/2013 11:35 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
With deferred probing, late_initcall() is too soon to declare a clock as
unused. Wait for deferred probing to finish before declaring a clock as
unused. Since deferred probing is done in late_initcall(), do the unused
check to late_initcall_sync.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index fe4055f..5ecb64c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int clk_disable_unused(void)
return 0;
}
-late_initcall(clk_disable_unused);
+late_initcall_sync(clk_disable_unused);
Without giving this too much thinking... Will boot time be affected
with this change?
No, we are just reordering the steps.
-Saravana
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
