Re: [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: Consider preemption when migrating hrtimer cpu_bases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Michael Bohan wrote:

> When switching to a new cpu_base in switch_hrtimer_base(), we
> briefly enable preemption by unlocking the cpu_base lock in two
> places. During this interval it's possible for the running thread
> to be swapped to a different CPU.
> 
> Consider the following example:
> 
> CPU #0                                 CPU #1
> ----                                   ----
> hrtimer_start()                        ...
>  lock_hrtimer_base()
>  switch_hrtimer_base()
>   this_cpu = 0;
>   target_cpu_base = 0;
>   raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock)
> <migrate to CPU 1>

Errm. switch_hrtimer_base() is called with interrupts disabled and
they stay disabled, so how exactly is the task going to be migrated?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux