On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/26/13 10:35, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 03/21/13 10:49, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 03/14/13 17:08, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> cyc_to_sched_clock() is called by sched_clock() and cyc_to_ns() > >>> is called by cyc_to_sched_clock(). I suspect that some compilers > >>> inline both of these functions into sched_clock() and so we've > >>> been getting away without having a notrace marking. It seems that > >>> my compiler isn't inlining cyc_to_sched_clock() though, so I'm > >>> hitting a recursion bug when I enable the function graph tracer, > >>> causing my system to crash. Marking these functions notrace fixes > >>> it. Technically cyc_to_ns() doesn't need the notrace because it's > >>> already marked inline, but let's just add it so that if we ever > >>> remove inline from that function it doesn't blow up. > >> Anyone else seeing this problem? > > Russell, should I put this into the patch tracker? > > I'll throw this into the patch tracker tomorrow if nobody complains. Or you could do so today. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
