On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Saravana, > > > On Tuesday 15 May 2012 06:38 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote: >> >> Btw, I didn't follow up on the other thread we were having, but can you >> remind me again what was the reason that you thought that only >> __clk_init() would work for your static init code and __clk_register() >> won't work? > > > One of the main reason has been the platform implementation we have to > handle some complex mux/divider combo clocks in OMAP2/3 which rely on > 'struct clk' pointers. Maybe we can do away with the existing > implementation and redo it so we don't have any such limitation, but the > quantum of change moving to common clk has been so much that we are > trying to minimize on the platform code changes for now. So while > we move to common clk it would still be useful to have __clk_init() > around for a while till we figure out how to get rid of it for OMAP. > Just to add to what Rajendra has stated for OMAP: after OMAP's conversion is finally made initcall-able then I'll get rid of lots of the gross macros and before-the-memory-allocator-is-alive stuff. I'll make sure that no other platforms are using those bits of course, but I plan on removing some of this stuff from the core once my platform is up to speed. Regards, Mike > regards, > Rajendra -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
