On 5/11/2012 1:30 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello, On Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:08 PM Laura Abbott wrote:I did a backport of the Contiguous Memory Allocator to a 3.0.8 tree. I wrote fairly simple test case that, in 1MB chunks, allocs up to 40MB from a reserved area, maps, writes, unmaps and then frees in an infinite loop. When running this with another program in parallel to put some stress on the filesystem, I hit data aborts in the filesystem/journal layer, although not always the same backtrace. As an example: [<c02907a4>] (__ext4_check_dir_entry+0x20/0x184) from [<c029e1a8>] (add_dirent_to_buf+0x70/0x2ac) [<c029e1a8>] (add_dirent_to_buf+0x70/0x2ac) from [<c029f3f0>] (ext4_add_entry+0xd8/0x4bc) [<c029f3f0>] (ext4_add_entry+0xd8/0x4bc) from [<c029fe90>] (ext4_add_nondir+0x14/0x64) [<c029fe90>] (ext4_add_nondir+0x14/0x64) from [<c02a04c4>] (ext4_create+0xd8/0x120) [<c02a04c4>] (ext4_create+0xd8/0x120) from [<c022e134>] (vfs_create+0x74/0xa4) [<c022e134>] (vfs_create+0x74/0xa4) from [<c022ed3c>] (do_last+0x588/0x8d4) [<c022ed3c>] (do_last+0x588/0x8d4) from [<c022fe64>] (path_openat+0xc4/0x394) [<c022fe64>] (path_openat+0xc4/0x394) from [<c0230214>] (do_filp_open+0x30/0x7c) [<c0230214>] (do_filp_open+0x30/0x7c) from [<c0220cb4>] (do_sys_open+0xd8/0x174) [<c0220cb4>] (do_sys_open+0xd8/0x174) from [<c0105ea0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30) Every panic had the same issue where a struct buffer_head [1] had a b_data that was unexpectedly NULL. During the course of CMA, buffer_migrate_page could be called to migrate from a CMA page to a new page. buffer_migrate_page calls set_bh_page[2] to set the new page for the buffer_head. If the new page is a highmem page though, the bh->b_data ends up as NULL, which could produce the panics seen above. This seems to indicate that highmem pages are not not appropriate for use as pages to migrate to. The following made the problem go away for me: --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -5753,7 +5753,7 @@ static struct page * __alloc_contig_migrate_alloc(struct page *page, unsigned long private, int **resultp) { - return alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE); + return alloc_page(GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE); } Does this seem like an actual issue or is this an artifact of my backport to 3.0? I'm not familiar enough with the filesystem layer to be able to tell where highmem can actually be used.I will need to investigate this further as this issue doesn't appear on v3.3+ kernels, but I remember I saw something similar when I tried CMA backported to v3.0.
The 3.0 kernel was the most stable I had around and easiest to work with. I'll be trying 3.4 sometime in the near future.
You have pointed to an important issue which we need to solve somehow. CMA wasn't fully tested with high mem and it looks that there are some issues here and there. Your patch will prevent using highmem for any migration triggered by CMA. IMHO this is a bit limited, but right now I have no better idea. For a quick backport it should be ok.
All the systems I'll be testing with will have highmem so I'll continue to report any problems I find. I'll be curious if this will show up again when I try 3.4. If it does, I'll see if I can get evidence of why this is the proper fix or a more nuanced patch.
Best regards
Thanks, Laura -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
