On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Laura Abbott wrote: > The 64bit division functions never had unwinding annotations > added. This prevents a backtrace from being printed within > the function and if a division by 0 occurs. Add the annotations. > > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/lib/div64.S | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/div64.S b/arch/arm/lib/div64.S > index faa7748..e55c484 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/lib/div64.S > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/div64.S > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/linkage.h> > +#include <asm/unwind.h> > > #ifdef __ARMEB__ > #define xh r0 > @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ > */ > > ENTRY(__do_div64) > +UNWIND(.fnstart) > > @ Test for easy paths first. > subs ip, r4, #1 > @@ -189,7 +191,12 @@ ENTRY(__do_div64) > moveq yh, xh > moveq xh, #0 > moveq pc, lr > +UNWIND(.fnend) > > +UNWIND(.fnstart) > +UNWIND(.pad #4) > +UNWIND(.save {lr}) > +Ldiv0_64: Why this phony fnend+fnstart here? Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html