On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:23:21PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, David Brown wrote: > > > Unless Russell objects, and prefers these to be in his tree, I'm fine > > with having these in a branch for linux-next that isn't merged > > upstream for now. > > > > The following changes since commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132: > > > > Linux 3.1-rc4 (2011-08-28 21:16:01 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/davidb/linux-msm.git msm-defconfig > > > > David Brown (1): > > ARM: msm: defconfigs for Qualcomm dev boards > > > > arch/arm/configs/msm7x30_defconfig | 68 +++++++++ > > arch/arm/configs/msm8660_defconfig | 96 +++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/configs/msm8960_defconfig | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/configs/qsd8x50_defconfig | 82 +++++++++++ > > What prevents you from merging them together? > Can't you build a single kernel binary with support for allMSM targets? Not yet, still a good bunch of things that need to happen before that can be done. I'm not even sure it's going to be possible before device tree, since the memory block where I read to determine which CPU I'm on differs from platform to platform. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
