Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote:
> Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells
> cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code.  Fix this to be consistent.
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would
> do so on SH as well.

Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was
noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the
patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly
after and then reintroduced today.

[1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux