> > The change I suggested involved replacing two typecasts with a single > min_t. All (or almost all) the places this patch touches currently > contain only one typecast, so the motivation for changing them is a lot > weaker. > You're right. So what's the final call on this one? Do you think it can be merged or you prefer not change anything? I personally think the code looks nicer using min_t instead of min with casting but that's just my opinion and of course there are arguments against this patch. Thanks, Tanya Brokhman --- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
