On 06/09/2011 01:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I can see some good use cases for having a socket to do IPC between OS > images that have a shared memory interconnect. What I see as most > problematic is to have it defined in a way that is tightly connected > to specific hardware from one vendor. If the protocol was defined > in a way that is useful for communication between virtual machines > (e.g. on top of virtio) and tranparent PCI bridges, it would probably > be much more acceptable. > > Arnd Yeah, we're trying to figure out the best way to do socket-based communication between various images within a SoC. I was thinking that some kind of registration scheme would be necessary for the new AF to support different SoCs and communication mechanisms. We'll take a look at ways to have a generic implementation. Thanks. - Bryan -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
