Neil, On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:04 +0100, Neil Leeder wrote: > Any opinions on what would be the best thing to do here? Choices appear to be: > > 1) allow the relative include path of ../vfp/vfpinstr.h > 2) move the definitions of fmrx, fmxr from vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm/vfp.h > 3) move vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm > 4) other...? > > If it helps, I can create a patch for whichever is considered the preferred solution. > I personally don't find option (1) that offensive - Bryan seemed to differ though so perhaps option (2) would keep him happy? I don't think option (3) is sensible given that the majority of the header file is private to /vfp. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
