On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:20:45PM -0800, David Brown wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24 2011, Dima Zavin wrote: > > > On that note, should we have a "drivers/arm/msm" instead of just > > "drivers/msm"? Other non-msm arm sub-arches probably have the same > > problem and polluting drivers/ top-level for every arm-subarch maybe > > undesirable. > > I'm moving linux-kernel to the 'to' field, and adding Greg KH to CC. > > This is about a new driver (ssbi) for the MSM chips, and where the > driver for this should go. The driver is specific to MSM chips (as far > as I know, the bus is only supported there). There are likely to be > future msm-specific drivers, so the suggestion was to put this under > drivers/msm, or possibly drivers/arm/msm. > > Anyone other suggestions, or preferences for the location? drivers/ssbi? What's keeping this from later moving off of the msm chips to run on others? USB started out only on one processor, as did a lot of other bus-specific drivers, before the hardware became present on other architectures. So no need to bury it under a msm specific location. Hope this helps, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
